Political Cartooning, Queering, and Hamilton
I’ve been pondering over a couple different examples of “queering”
performative utterances, but I think I’ve decided on two to discuss on this
platform. Indeed, the alternating of political or historical images seem to be a
very common choice around the internet, and actually I’m wondering if political
cartoons and political satire could be considered “queering” of performative
utterances. I don’t think satire uniformly fits under this umbrella, but
consider, for example, this political cartoon from last week:

The image contains several performative acts, from Trump performing Nazi
salute to Hitler using the speech act “You’re hired.” When it comes to queering
of a performative utterance, the fact that the president of the United States,
an office and entity that has 80 years of ostensibly standing against National
Socialism and autocracy and 243 years of standing for democracy, is throwing
the salute of a fascist seems like a deliberate satirical attempt at playing
off expected behavior.
Another example
I considered is the musical Hamilton. Hamilton takes the racial expectations
of a play about the American revolution and turns them on their head, casting
people of color in roles that were originally filled by white people. The
result is a sort of “coloring in” of a previously white-washed historical
narrative. The music of the time period was entirely orchestral, but the
creative team for Hamilton filled the play with rap, hip hop, R&B, and
other music traditionally created by artists of color. All of this serves to queer
the final result away from our expectations.

Not only that,
but I feel like it’s important to note that both of these examples have
positive end results, connotations, and/or effects. I suppose that the term “positive”
is highly subjective, but I think the critical and financial success of Hamilton,
and the ongoing popularity of political cartooning speak to the way our culture
values them at large. To me, this shows “queering” in a very positive light.
Historically, given the negative and homophobic associations with the word
queer, I would guess that those outside the academic community probably are still overcoming these negative connotations associated with that word, but every example that I have
seen on our class’ blogs have shown this in a positive way. That may seem like a “duh” statement to us as
a group, or maybe not even relevant, but it seems important to continue to note
positive things given the renewed popular rise of fascism and bigotry around the world.
Hamilton is a great example, a performative reclamation of ostensibly white history. Note how a reversal of this gesture wouldn't work. Imagine some misbegotten idea of an all-white country/western version of, say, The Color Purple or Raisin in the Sun. What's the difference there?
ReplyDelete